Example: Using Aspen Plus to model an ethanol from corn process.

Download as pdf : 
Products: Aspen Plus 
Last Updated: 06-Mar-2017
Versions: 
Article ID: 000056996
Primary Subject: 

Problem Statement

Is it possible to model an ethanol from corn process using Aspen Plus?

Solution

Attached is an example of this process. This example will run in Aspen Plus 2006 and higher.

1. Introduction

This file is a model of a dry-grind corn-to-ethanol plant process and it is intended for the following uses:

  • Understanding the relationships between key variables for producing bioethanol from corn.
  • Provides an example of how to model the different areas of this process.
  • Supply a starting set of components and physical property parameters for modeling processes of this type

 The model is not intended for equipment design or specifying other engineering documents without further review by a process engineer with experience of corn-to-ethanol processes.

 The bioethanol from corn model includes the following features:

  • A nominal set of chemical species and property parameters for this process.
  • Typical process areas including: liquefaction, saccharification, fermentation, distillation, evaporation, dehydration, and the main streams connecting these units.
  • Key process control specifications such as backset flow, fermenter ethanol percent, solids concentration, specifications for distillation columns and near-zero-net water balance.
  • Usability features such as an Excel SCALE calculator which allows the user to scale plant production rate and apply corns of varying starch content. 

2. Components

The following components represent the chemical species present in the process:

ID

Type

Formula

Name

WATER

CONV

H2O

WATER

ETOH

CONV

C2H6O-2

ETHANOL

CO2

CONV

CO2

CARBON-DIOXIDE

GLUCOSE

CONV

C6H12O6

DEXTROSE

STARCH

SOLID

 

 

C5POLY

SOLID

 

 

C6POLY

SOLID

 

 

PROTINS

SOLID

 

 

OIL

SOLID

 

 

NFDS

CONV

C6H12O6

Non-fermentable Dissolved Solids

XYLOSE

CONV

C6H12O6

C5 Sugars

PROTSOL

CONV

C6H12O6

Soluble Protein

 SOLID component types represent non-library chemicals with user specified property parameters. CONV components such as NFDS, XYLOSE, and PROTSOL originate as ?clones? of glucose and are later modified with their own property parameters. For example, the molecular weight of XYLOSE is modified to that of xylose (C5) in a Pure Component Paragraph.

3. Process Description

The process includes the following stages: 

System
 
Purpose
MillingReduces corn kernels to the particle size distribution required for further processing
LiquificationPrimary step in starch hydrolysis to release poly-saccharides
SaccharificationEnzymatic hydrolysis of polysaccharides to fermentable sugars
FermentationConversion of sugars to ethanol and CO2
DistillationConcentration of ethanol to 190 proof
DehydrationConcentration of ethanol to its final 200 proof
CentrifugationSeparate solids from liquid out of beer column bottoms stream
EvaporationConcentrate dissolved solids in stillage
DryingAchieve desired moisture in DDGS (dried distillers grains with solubles) product
 

4. Physical Properties

This category includes the models and methods used to calculate the chemical and thermodynamic equilibrium, and the physical properties of all streams. The models and methods used in Aspen Plus are grouped into Option-Sets named after the central model, e.g., Ideal, Redlich-Kwong-Soave, NRTL (Non-Random Two Liquid). The property Option-Set used in this model is NRTL.

Physical Properties are usually the most important and often the most difficult part of a simulation. The accuracy of physical property calculations strongly influences the reliability of the results and ultimately affects the estimated cost of process equipment.

5. Chemical Reactions

Dozens if not hundreds of chemical reactions occur in this process. These have been simplified in this model to the following:

1.       Saccharification

STARCH + WATER = GLUCOSE

99% conversion of STARCH

2.       Fermentation

GLUCOSE = 1.9 ETOH + 1.9 CO2 + .06 NFDS 100% conversion of GLUCOSE

NFDS = PROTSOL molar extent 3.31 lbmol/hr at 25 mmgal/yr

Saccharification and fermentation reactors are simplified to continuous operations. Conversions and molar extents are adjustable parameters in the model. No attempt has been made to model the action of enzymes and yeast in the reactors.

6. Simulation Approach

Unit Operations - Major unit operations have been represented by Aspen Plus models as in the table below.

Aspen Plus Unit Operation Models Used in the Bioethanol from Corn Model

Unit Operation

Aspen Plus model

Comments / Specifications

Saccharification and Fermentation

RStoic

Simplified simulation with stoichiometric reactions

Distillation / Scrubber

RadFrac

Rigorous multi-stage distillation model.

Beer Column with 9 theoretical stages

Rectifier with 18 theoretical stages

Dehydration

Sep

Simplified separation block, not a true separation block based on adsorption

Dewatering

SSplit

Simplified separation block, not a true separation block based on centrifugation

Heaters/Coolers

Heater

Simplified heater model.

DDGS Drying

Flash2

Flash calculation; calculates heat load required to achieve desired moisture.

Evaporation

Flash2

Flash calculation; calculates heat load required to achieve desired vapor fraction.

Streams - Streams represent the material and energy flows in, out and around the process. Streams can be of three types: Material, Heat, and Work. Feeds to the process are corn, energy, water, acid, enzyme and yeast; the later three are represented by NFDS, WATER and WATER components respectively for simplicity. There are several internal streams that represent the crossover of material and heat between blocks. A key internal stream is 59BS representing backset.

Design-Specs, Calculator Blocks and Convergence - The simulation is augmented with a combination of flowsheeting capabilities such as Convergence, Design Specs and Calculator Blocks.

Sequencing and Convergence paragraphs are included that produce a relatively stable model at varied rates. The model has been tested at production capacities as low as 15 mmgal/yr and as high as 180 mmgal/yr and has run successfully aided by these convergence elements.

The following tables outline key flowsheeting capabilities of this model:

Design Specs Used in the Corn to Ethanol Model

Spec Name

Spec (Target)

Manipulated Variable

 

DDGS

Dry DDGS to 9% moisture

 

DRYDDGS pressure to calculate-heat duty

FERM

gm ethanol/LT in Beer to 12%

SPLITPC flow-split. process water export

PREVAP

pct solids in feed to centrifuge

PRE-EVAP vapor fraction

SYRUP

Concentrate evap6 liquid to 55% solids

EVAP6 vapor fraction

WG

"Wet Grains are 35% solids" out of centrifuge

Stream 55TS flow

WWTR

Close water balance to 100 kg/hr (strm EXTRAPC) excess

Adding scrubber water; 87WATER flow to SCRUBBER

Flowsheet Calculators Used in the Corn to Ethanol Model

Name

Purpose

BACKSET

Backset is 15% of final mash volume

 

DISSOLVE

Calculates starch heat of solution

 

EVALUATE

Compare key process results at different production rates. Use in conjunction with Calculator SCALE. Uses Excel spreadsheet.

SCALE

Scale production (up or down) to a new capacity. Adjusts all feeds and Tear Streams based on new capacity. Use in conjunction with Calculator EVALUATE. Uses Excel spreadsheet.

YEAST

Set extent for reaction No. 2 in FERMENT block (see Section 4. Reactions above) as a function of mass flow, glucose content and density of mash feed to Fermenter (Stream 23MASH)

Calculator blocks SCALE and EVALUATE are Spreadsheets in Excel, and are both embedded in the file with extension .apmbd. Use SCALE to change the characteristics of the corn feed as follows:

150

Plant Capacity, MM Gallons per Year

0.15

Moisture in Corn

0.7

Starch in Corn 

Calculator block EVALUATE may be easily modified to add more comparison variables that are of interest.

7. Simulation Results

The Aspen Plus simulation flowsheet and key results are shown below:

Key Simulation Results

Result

 

Units

Plant capacity (pure ethanol)

100

MM gal/yr

Corn feed (total wet)

249278

lb/hr

Corn moisture (fixed)

15%

 

Corn starch

70%

 

Enzyme flow

63

lb/hr

Yeast flow

5.2

lb/hr

Acid flow

124

lb/hr

Water make-up to SCRUBBER

18019

lb/hr

Plant near-zero-net water discharge

100

lb/hr

 

 

 

Fermenter ETOH Conc, gm/LT

120

gm/ltr

Backset

15.0%

 

 

 

 

Steam cost (6 $/MMBtu)

2845

$/hr

Steam cost (7920 hr/yr)

2.25E+07

$/yr

 

 

 

Beer column diameter (0.62 fract. approach to flooding)

14.1

ft

Rectifier diameter (0.75 top fract. approach to flooding, 0.5 bottom)

13.4

ft

 

 

 

Fermentation Efficiency (Glucose to ETOH conv.)

100.0%

 

Starch Efficiency

99.0%

 

8. Conclusions

The bioethanol from corn model provides a useful description of the process. The simulation has been developed using many of the capabilities of Aspen Plus including unit operation models, physical property methods, models and data, and flowsheeting capabilities like convergence design specs.

The model may be used as a guide for understanding the process and the economics, and also as a starting point for more sophisticated models for plant design and specifying process equipment. 

9. References

1.       F. Taylor, A.J. McAloon, J.C. Craig, Jr., P. Yang, J. Wahjudi and S.R. Eckhoff "Fermentation and Costs of Fuel Ethanol from Corn with Quick-Germ Process", Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 94:41-49, 2001.

2.       F. Taylor, M.J. Kurantz, N. Goldberg, A.J. McAloon and J.C. Craig, Jr., "Dry-Grind Process for Fuel Ethanol by Continuous Fermentation and Stripping", Biotechnology Progress, 16:541-547, 2000.

3.       McAloon, F. Taylor, W. Yee, K. Ibsen and R. Wooley, "Determining the Cost of Producing Ethanol from Corn Starch and Lignocellulosic Feedstocks", National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, October, 2000.

http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=766198

4.       R.J. Wooley and V. Putsche, "Development of an ASPEN PLUS Physical Property Database for Biofuels Components", National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, April, 1996.

http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=257362

Attachments
Filename Date Added
Bioethanol_from_Corn.zip 18-Jan-2017
Bioethanol_from_corn_2004.1.zip 18-Jan-2017