Problem Statement
Is it possible to model an ethanol from corn process using Aspen Plus?
Solution
Attached is an example of this process. This example will run in Aspen Plus 2006 and higher.
This file is a model of a dry-grind corn-to-ethanol plant process and it is intended for the following uses:
The model is not intended for equipment design or specifying other engineering documents without further review by a process engineer with experience of corn-to-ethanol processes.
The bioethanol from corn model includes the following features:
The following components represent the chemical species present in the process:
ID
Type
Formula
Name
WATER
CONV
H2O
ETOH
C2H6O-2
ETHANOL
CO2
CARBON-DIOXIDE
GLUCOSE
C6H12O6
DEXTROSE
STARCH
SOLID
C5POLY
C6POLY
PROTINS
OIL
NFDS
Non-fermentable Dissolved Solids
XYLOSE
C5 Sugars
PROTSOL
Soluble Protein
SOLID component types represent non-library chemicals with user specified property parameters. CONV components such as NFDS, XYLOSE, and PROTSOL originate as ?clones? of glucose and are later modified with their own property parameters. For example, the molecular weight of XYLOSE is modified to that of xylose (C5) in a Pure Component Paragraph.
The process includes the following stages:
This category includes the models and methods used to calculate the chemical and thermodynamic equilibrium, and the physical properties of all streams. The models and methods used in Aspen Plus are grouped into Option-Sets named after the central model, e.g., Ideal, Redlich-Kwong-Soave, NRTL (Non-Random Two Liquid). The property Option-Set used in this model is NRTL.
Physical Properties are usually the most important and often the most difficult part of a simulation. The accuracy of physical property calculations strongly influences the reliability of the results and ultimately affects the estimated cost of process equipment.
Dozens if not hundreds of chemical reactions occur in this process. These have been simplified in this model to the following:
1. Saccharification
STARCH + WATER = GLUCOSE
99% conversion of STARCH
2. Fermentation
GLUCOSE = 1.9 ETOH + 1.9 CO2 + .06 NFDS 100% conversion of GLUCOSE
NFDS = PROTSOL molar extent 3.31 lbmol/hr at 25 mmgal/yr
Saccharification and fermentation reactors are simplified to continuous operations. Conversions and molar extents are adjustable parameters in the model. No attempt has been made to model the action of enzymes and yeast in the reactors.
Unit Operations - Major unit operations have been represented by Aspen Plus models as in the table below.
Aspen Plus Unit Operation Models Used in the Bioethanol from Corn Model
Unit Operation
Aspen Plus model
Comments / Specifications
Saccharification and Fermentation
RStoic
Simplified simulation with stoichiometric reactions
Distillation / Scrubber
RadFrac
Rigorous multi-stage distillation model.
Beer Column with 9 theoretical stages
Rectifier with 18 theoretical stages
Dehydration
Sep
Simplified separation block, not a true separation block based on adsorption
Dewatering
SSplit
Simplified separation block, not a true separation block based on centrifugation
Heaters/Coolers
Heater
Simplified heater model.
DDGS Drying
Flash2
Flash calculation; calculates heat load required to achieve desired moisture.
Evaporation
Flash calculation; calculates heat load required to achieve desired vapor fraction.
Streams - Streams represent the material and energy flows in, out and around the process. Streams can be of three types: Material, Heat, and Work. Feeds to the process are corn, energy, water, acid, enzyme and yeast; the later three are represented by NFDS, WATER and WATER components respectively for simplicity. There are several internal streams that represent the crossover of material and heat between blocks. A key internal stream is 59BS representing backset.
Design-Specs, Calculator Blocks and Convergence - The simulation is augmented with a combination of flowsheeting capabilities such as Convergence, Design Specs and Calculator Blocks.
Sequencing and Convergence paragraphs are included that produce a relatively stable model at varied rates. The model has been tested at production capacities as low as 15 mmgal/yr and as high as 180 mmgal/yr and has run successfully aided by these convergence elements.
The following tables outline key flowsheeting capabilities of this model:
Design Specs Used in the Corn to Ethanol Model
Spec Name
Spec (Target)
Manipulated Variable
DDGS
Dry DDGS to 9% moisture
DRYDDGS pressure to calculate-heat duty
FERM
gm ethanol/LT in Beer to 12%
SPLITPC flow-split. process water export
PREVAP
pct solids in feed to centrifuge
PRE-EVAP vapor fraction
SYRUP
Concentrate evap6 liquid to 55% solids
EVAP6 vapor fraction
WG
"Wet Grains are 35% solids" out of centrifuge
Stream 55TS flow
WWTR
Close water balance to 100 kg/hr (strm EXTRAPC) excess
Adding scrubber water; 87WATER flow to SCRUBBER
Flowsheet Calculators Used in the Corn to Ethanol Model
Purpose
BACKSET
Backset is 15% of final mash volume
DISSOLVE
Calculates starch heat of solution
EVALUATE
Compare key process results at different production rates. Use in conjunction with Calculator SCALE. Uses Excel spreadsheet.
SCALE
Scale production (up or down) to a new capacity. Adjusts all feeds and Tear Streams based on new capacity. Use in conjunction with Calculator EVALUATE. Uses Excel spreadsheet.
YEAST
Set extent for reaction No. 2 in FERMENT block (see Section 4. Reactions above) as a function of mass flow, glucose content and density of mash feed to Fermenter (Stream 23MASH)
Calculator blocks SCALE and EVALUATE are Spreadsheets in Excel, and are both embedded in the file with extension .apmbd. Use SCALE to change the characteristics of the corn feed as follows:
150
Plant Capacity, MM Gallons per Year
0.15
Moisture in Corn
0.7
Starch in Corn
Calculator block EVALUATE may be easily modified to add more comparison variables that are of interest.
The Aspen Plus simulation flowsheet and key results are shown below:
Key Simulation Results
Result
Units
Plant capacity (pure ethanol)
100
MM gal/yr
Corn feed (total wet)
249278
lb/hr
Corn moisture (fixed)
15%
Corn starch
70%
Enzyme flow
63
Yeast flow
5.2
Acid flow
124
Water make-up to SCRUBBER
18019
Plant near-zero-net water discharge
Fermenter ETOH Conc, gm/LT
120
gm/ltr
Backset
15.0%
Steam cost (6 $/MMBtu)
2845
$/hr
Steam cost (7920 hr/yr)
2.25E+07
$/yr
Beer column diameter (0.62 fract. approach to flooding)
14.1
ft
Rectifier diameter (0.75 top fract. approach to flooding, 0.5 bottom)
13.4
Fermentation Efficiency (Glucose to ETOH conv.)
100.0%
Starch Efficiency
99.0%
The bioethanol from corn model provides a useful description of the process. The simulation has been developed using many of the capabilities of Aspen Plus including unit operation models, physical property methods, models and data, and flowsheeting capabilities like convergence design specs.
The model may be used as a guide for understanding the process and the economics, and also as a starting point for more sophisticated models for plant design and specifying process equipment.
1. F. Taylor, A.J. McAloon, J.C. Craig, Jr., P. Yang, J. Wahjudi and S.R. Eckhoff "Fermentation and Costs of Fuel Ethanol from Corn with Quick-Germ Process", Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 94:41-49, 2001.
2. F. Taylor, M.J. Kurantz, N. Goldberg, A.J. McAloon and J.C. Craig, Jr., "Dry-Grind Process for Fuel Ethanol by Continuous Fermentation and Stripping", Biotechnology Progress, 16:541-547, 2000.
3. McAloon, F. Taylor, W. Yee, K. Ibsen and R. Wooley, "Determining the Cost of Producing Ethanol from Corn Starch and Lignocellulosic Feedstocks", National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, October, 2000.
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=766198
4. R.J. Wooley and V. Putsche, "Development of an ASPEN PLUS Physical Property Database for Biofuels Components", National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, April, 1996.
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=257362